Home > Blog > My position on GM
 

Clive's blog

My position on GM

posted on  ,

Labelling

We - the consumers of GM - are being treated like guinea pigs. We demand to know what we are eating, for the food that comes from chemical industrial agriculture is neither equivalent to what we grow at home or that we used to buy in green grocers. Labelling of all GM food is not an unreasonable demand - it is our right.

Patents

The issuing of patents on GM seeds gives corporations unrestricted power over non-GM seeds. It encourages GM companies to contaminate the food chain until all non-GM seeds have GM genes. It works in the same insidious way that European colonisation spread disease throughout native populations and caused those populations to collapse. That’s what GM threatens to do to heirloom seeds and non-GM open pollinated seeds. Thousands of years of selection destroyed because the US won’t regulate GM seeds. It establishes in law superior rights similar to those of the divine right of monarchs over their subjects that took hundreds of years to overturn. There is no basis of morality or ethics if a GM farmer can contaminate a neighbours crop and destroy the livelihood of a non-GM farmer without redress.

Power

Using the foundation stone of seed patenting, Monsanto has increased sales and profit by 500-600% in about 10 years with sales of $11.3 billion in 2008. Buying up scores of seed companies (including the world’s largest company, Seminis, and its huge seed bank) it has become the world’s largest seed company. It is now so big and litiguous its provision for litigation is $272 million (2008) - which exceeds the sales of all but 6 of the largest seed companies! This amount is effectively to fund law suits (my guess is against one in every 40 of its customers - i.e. farmers). How’s that for customer relations!

Some thoughts on “My position on GM”

Sonia (Mt Samson) on Thursday, 26 January 2012 at 2:11:56 PM said:

How is it that patenting of genetics was even considered? Can I pull apart a car engine, say a Ford, and put in a few Holden screws and patent it as mine?

LORRAINE (WEST WODONGA) on Monday, 6 February 2012 at 6:39:48 PM said:

Monsanto would have to be the worst company on earth. Their greed is huge. They have members in many government departments around the world, thats why they can patent genes, thats why we can't get proper GM labelling. The government is hopeless, they couldn't care less about the Australian people, it's all about greed and money. Thats the only thing they understand. I have researched GM and Monsanto for over 3years, what I found was just frightening. Thats why I try and grow all my own vegies and lobby government to wake up and smell the toxic GM sludge they expect us to eat. I can only hope that one day we will have a government that will care more about the Australian people than international corportations.

Kerry (Andergrove) on Monday, 27 February 2012 at 11:31:04 AM said:

I don't understand how, if the GM plants as so natural that they don't need labelling, then HOW can they be so unique as to be able to be patented? Its one or the other, Monsanto!

ROBERT (MORWELL) on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 at 11:03:26 PM said:

Most modern allergies and ills are caused by manufactured food as our bodies do not know how to utilise them and this relates to GE products as well. I always thought that DNA defined species so GE is producing new species of unknown nutrition or toxicity level.

SALLY (MARGARET RIVER) on Thursday, 26 April 2012 at 5:34:51 PM said:

On 3 April 2012. the international coalition of “No Patents on Seeds” published a report on patents connected to the conventional breeding of plants and animals granted by, or applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) in 2011.
The report gives examples of patents on sunflowers, melons, cucumbers, rice and wheat. Patents were granted despite a decision of the highest court of the EPO (Enlarged Board of Appeal) in 2010, reaffirming the prohibition of patents on conventional breeding as written in European patent laws. As the new report shows, industry and examiners at the EPO are systematically using legal loopholes to grant patents on seeds, plants and even harvest and food products derived thereof.The last I heard this amounted to thousands of patents. So it's not only through GM that the corporations are determined to control our seeds - and animals. GM is worse because their is no evidence that the food is safe to eat but who wants to be looking over their shoulder every time you plant a seed.For more information http://no-patents-on-seeds.org/


animals in the EU.but can't : www.no-patents-on-seeds.org

Dominique (SHOREHAM) on Friday, 27 April 2012 at 3:33:51 AM said:

I agree with Robert - I am absolutely convinced that the ever increasing number of people I know with 'gluten' allergies have GE wheat to blame. As someone committed to organic produce it horrifies me that this activity is deemed legal ! The ramifications are huge and yet the average person in the street would not have a clue this is even happening - what to do ?

Leave a reply

Sorry you have to be logged in to post a comment.

Topics

Archives